Search

Introduction

Dear Visitors,                                                                                                                                    April 21, 2017

Thank you for stopping at FlatEarthLunacy.com

As a scientist with college degree in Astronomy, minor in Physics and Mathematics, I was appalled to find folks telling outright falsities and presenting bad science to bolster suspicion of our known accepted reality - that the Earth is a beautiful blue globe.

This blog clearly shows scientific proofs that debunk everything that flat Earth proponents claim.  Here we also expose the comments those YouTube video channels delete, because they don't want you to see them.

The Earth is not flat.  That claim is a conspiracy theory perpetrated by ignorant people who have ulterior personal motives and agendas.

The Earth is a beautiful blue spheroid globe spinning on an axis 23.5° once each day, and orbiting the Sun every 365.25 days.

   JonahTheScientist.png

  

kind regards,  Jonah The Scientist


(This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)                 © FlatEarthLunacy.com (2015 - 2022) - All rights reserved

Get notified of new articles on Twitter / Facebooktwitter.com/FlatEarthLunacy , facebook.com/flatearthlunacyofficial   

JonahTheScientist SALES / Recommendations: STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) science projects for young adults, and science books for everyone.  Enjoy! 


Here is a list of our copyright and USPTO Legal Trademarks:


Trademark of name “Jonah The Scientist”
Trademark of name “Flat Earth Lunacy” 
Trademark of logo of “Jonah The Scientist”
Copyright of artwork at the US Library of Congress, for “JonahTheScientist Official Logo”
In any word combination, script, color, or word separation by blanks or other characters.

Our internet blog/web sites are exclusively licensed to FlatEarthLunacy.com, twitter.com/FlatEarthLunacy, facebook.com/flatearthlunacyofficial AND https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7ipUKERU0tzYFxALJBli4A/discussion.

Our articles and screen shots authorized under - Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976.  Allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” This internet site may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

 

Sleeping Warrior (Anthony Riley) - flat Earth advocate FAIL, deluded flat Earther wants to waste more of you money

   
Dear Anthony Riley, 

Anthony's statement below:
   
"I have a rare opportunity to get a legal, peer reviewed, pro flat earth, dissertation into the education system at the highest of levels and although it wont be blatant "The earth is flat", it will be critically challenging the National Curriculum with regards to how reliable and credible the tuition the children of today are actually being taught, is.

I currently have an undergraduate degree in Law, with honours, and it is a Qualifying Law Degree. I furthered my study with a Post Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice. I want to write a Masters Degree level paper and submit it for the dreaded "peer review" by my legal peers. My tutor is a practising barrister and not just any old teacher. This is the big league.

I want to get this FE paper back "out the other side" so it will then count as a genuinely peer reviewed paper that can be published in the future as a book in its own right. It will gain lots of interest from academia if it does not fail for being "anti-establishment" in some way. 

FE is criticised for having no science. With an academic and legal approach concerning the evidence we are shown for the shape of our world, I will challenge the evidence and question the legal position of everybody in education, from the Secretary of State for Education, down to the Board of Governors in Higher Education, down to the teachers at grass roots level. Obviously, the role of most teachers will not be capable to be shown to be fraudulent, they are all teaching what they were taught. The focus is not on the individual teacher, the focus will be on the system that allows possibly unsubstantiated teachings. Consideration will also be given to how the (role of) media supports the educational narrative.

The risk is that the work will be rejected for being anti-establishment and could even satisfy a loose interpretation of "terrorist" by nature. For this reason, the work can not be too overt. It must be balanced with arguments both ways and the points of law being pointed out throughout.

This could hit the mainstream news and create issues for me legally so it will be executed with careful consideration of the phraseology will be considered throughout. It wont be too overt. However, it will be critical and I think that risk management is the key to getting this through the other side. 

The funds are around £2,000 for the year of study I need to undertake. It will be completed by summer of 2019. As part of the GoFundMe, I will gift a soft copy to every person that donates £25 or more but the soft copy will only come AFTER the examination board has sat and granted the award. If the submission is rejected, a soft copy will still be provided.

I need 84 people donating just £25 each to hit the target. I have about 3 weeks to raise the funds. I will also release the submission in a more generic format after the award is (hopefully) given by way of a non-legal format, easy to read version. There will be pictures in both versions, it wont be text heavy. It will be written in a way that every flat earther will be able to understand and a minimal amount of legalese to make it readable by all.. but I will have to balance that with enough of the law to get it passed.

Please help me buy just helping me pay for the course. Anything beyond will help towards the other costs but the absolute minimum I need is around £2,000 just for the fees to be on the course."

2.  Flat Earth - Squirming Warrior And His Inefficient Damage Control

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGzD9j-YzAs

Anthony Riley says to Dell (Beyond the Imaginary Curve)…

Do you know why I am proud to be a potato?  I’m proud of being in allegiance, standing should to shoulder, with people like Patricia (Steere).  She gets so much shit from people in this (flat Earth) community … because they either want to fuck her or they want to be her.  And the reality is I stand right beside her.

Guess what? You’ve got a Civic, judging by your tight ass seat behind you. … I drive a range rover.  Therefore, my dick is bigger that your dick.


   2019-03-06_16-08-26.png

Hi Anthony. What did you do with the £2,335 "Help me slip FE into a university?" GoFundMe money you collected?

Spent it on drugs, hookers and sports cars. Any scientific evidence for gravity yet?

Didn't think so.

- -

Jonah TheScientist - DELETED POST
The moon moves in a stable orbit...   


   deleted post 2.jpg


- -

@Sleeping Warrior I thought it was 'Blerfers' who distract, dismiss, divert? This is a straight forward question that should have a straight forward answer. Did the examiner of your thesis agree there was no scientific evidence for gravity? Or did it get thrown out before it even got to that point?

@nWo 4Life I answered it directly.
You won't ever answer questions directly though will you. Why won't you accept that gravity is not a force and nothing more than a fanatical belief of religitards obsessed with lying about science to children unable to critically think for themselves? I know....it's because you are a fanatic.


@Sleeping WarriorI answered it directly. Fair enough. But you did enroll and you did submit a thesis so you used your own money for that and then used the GoFundMe money for skag and smut?!
Ask me a question and I will answer it directly. Then answer my question - Did the examiner of your thesis agree there was no scientific evidence for gravity? Or did it get thrown out before it even got to that point?


@Sleeping Warrior - Well I saw this response from JonahTheScientist yesterday, but now it's gone Anthony. Why did you DELETE IT? JonahTheScientist wrote here ...
The Moon moves in a stable orbit around the Earth, because of the Moon’s velocity (speed & direction) and the attraction force of gravity. Without the influence of gravity the Moon would not orbit the Earth. So please explain why the Moon circles the Earth every 27.3 days. OK?
- -
If you claim that the Moon is not real, or is a projection in the sky, well than that is an entirely different issue – which you need to prove on its own. Best way is for you yourself to measure the distance to the Moon. That alone is acceptable evidence. Using simple trigonometry parallax: To find the distance of the Moon from the Earth, you and a friend stand 1,000 km apart and each take a picture of the Moon at exactly the same time. Then, compare your images. The Moon will be in a different spot, but the background stars will be in the same place. What your images have given you is a triangle. You know the base (the distance between you and your friend), and you can find the angle at the top (the point of the Moon in this triangle). Simple geometry will give you a value for the distance of the Moon.
- -
Ok. So please post your parallax result here for us to see. kind regards,

@nWo 4Life nah, I'm not answering your question. It off topic and of a personal nature. All you need to know is that the money was used to pay for the course. That's it.

@Robert Oberdove I didn't delete it. It might be in spam. I'm the only admin/mod. There is no other person that could have deleted it. Only me.

@Sleeping Warrior Actually it's 100% on topic for this thread and I was just trying to clarify a statement which you said was a direct answer? But again, fair enough if you don't want to answer it.
How about the other question? Did the examiner of your thesis agree there was no scientific evidence for gravity? Or did it get thrown out before it even got to that point? You insert 'gravity is not a force' into every topic and reply so it HAS to be on topic.

@nWo 4Life I'm not addressing any ins and outs of the course. You wouldn't believe me anyway so why even ask?

@Sleeping Warrior Wait? you plastered it all over Youtube when it was ongoing and you even showed screenshots of your correspondence with the head of the dept? But now you have gone all coy? I think that tells me all I need to know. Thanks.

@nWo 4Life Have a really flat day!!!

@Sleeping Warrior I will try but the BALL and chain will likely give me a load of jobs to do, although I am already ahead of the CURVE. I have a few issues to deal with at work but I understand the GRAVITY of the situation. Laters! 😉

- -

Hello Anthony. So please write here your answer to the 2 questions posed by JonahTheScientist: 1. Without the influence of gravity the Moon would not orbit the Earth. So please explain why the Moon circles the Earth every 27.3 days. OK? 2. What is the distance (via parallax method described) to the Moon, that you and a friend determined? How many miles up? If you don't answer both questions, well then, that speaks for itself.


   Deleted post 3.jpg

- - 

So now Anthony, I have evidence that you are purposely deleting comments that you don't want your channel visitors to see. All to make you look better. My friend Robert Oberdove posted the following comment...
*
Robert Oberdove10 hours ago Hello Anthony. So please write here your answer to the 2 questions posed by JonahTheScientist: 1. Without the influence of gravity the Moon would not orbit the Earth. So please explain why the Moon circles the Earth every 27.3 days. OK? 2. What is the distance (via parallax method described) to the Moon, that you and a friend determined? How many miles up? If you don't answer both questions, well then, that speaks for itself.
*
That comment is not here visible. And now we also believe that the missing JonahTheScientist comment, despite what you claim about your innicense and spam, was ALSO deliberately deleted.
What say you?


   Anthony Riley deleted this post 1.jpg

- - 

@Luke Matheson stop moanin

@Sleeping Warrior - Just gathered evidence to show the world that you:
1. Delete comments by visitors to make posts appear to agree with your flat earth narrative, and that you deliberately lie about not manipulating anything.
2. You want to keep the flat earth conspiracy going for personal sadistic reasons (you enjoy being a smart ass and infuriating people) and for monetary gain. You just want to create trouble.
3. When presented with easy (experiments /observations) that you can make yourself to finally prove one way or another the true shape of the Earth (like from JonahTheScientist on how very easily determine the true distance to the Moon and settle that question), you will mock and not do those experiments for fear your flat earth views will be proved wrong. You want to keep the charade going as long as possible.
4. You are just a down right lying, manipulative and nasty person. As such you are hurting yourself and society.
P.S. - It will take you decades to work off the damaging karma you are generating.

@Luke Matheson stop moanin

@Sleeping Warrior - this is your last chance to do the right thing.
You measure the distance to the Moon so that it can be settled once and for all. OK?
Let us know on what date you will begin the following experiment:
Best way is for you yourself to measure the distance to the Moon. That alone is acceptable evidence. Using simple trigonometry parallax: To find the distance of the Moon from the Earth, you and a friend stand 1,000 km apart and each take a picture of the Moon at exactly the same time. Then, compare your images. The Moon will be in a different spot, but the background stars will be in the same place. What your images have given you is a triangle. You know the base (the distance between you and your friend), and you can find the angle at the top (the point of the Moon in this triangle). Simple geometry will give you a value for the distance of the Moon.
Good luck. We look forward to SEEING your results posted HERE.

-

Update: March 3, 2021

Looks like his current YouTube channel has been terminated:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgc9BMkY5M3lslgp6HdyznQ/videos?reload=9


   Anthony Riley - Youtube channel terminated.jpg




Same article here:
Anthony Riley (aka Sleeping Warrior) - flat Earth advocate is interested in keeping the mayhem going, for personal notoriety and money. He selectively deletes video comments and will not perform experiments that disprove Flat Earth. He is a fraud



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


His full disertation can be found here (9925014.pdf): https://mega.nz/#F!Ol8kAYZY!D91j_Fs9jWhB3cHs0p7-iA

Conclusions from the perspective of law

It is clear that there are numerous opposing arguements against the Copernican model. One collage of proofs against the Copernican model argues “200 proofs the Earth Is Not a Spinning Ball”20 and even if 199 of them are false, it only takes 1 to be right and we dont live in a Copernican model afterall.


If you were to actually watch all 200 proofs against the idea that we are spinning (at all), orbiting anything, spherical in shape and gravitationally attracted to the centre of mass as we are told, you will come out doubting everything you were taught unless you are so indoctrinated by Copernicism that you just dismiss it ignorantly. If a Judge were to be presented 200 proofs that the earth was not actually a spinning ball, The Judge would have to consider the merits of all 200 proofs and come to a conslusion. Aside from being time consuming, it is difficult to dismiss so many without good reason to do so.

As said previously, the point of this paper is not to actually question the shape of the earth and if it orbits the sun or not. The point is to point out that the National Curriculum does not alert children that the solar system, as taught currently, does seem to be indoctrinating children with partisan politics without any balanced opposing views to the contrary being even discussed. There isnt even the disclaimer statement that Dimmock deemed necessary to the solar system. Children, for the past thirty, years have all been taught a Copernican model that is demonstrably questionable (by the evidences of just this paper) and the law requires this one sided indoctrination to be prohibited if indeed it finds it to be promoted and partisan. There is no mention of any opposing views. Whether we live in a Copernican model, or a geocentric Aristotolian model, created by a greater intelligence or living in some kind of electric universe, these are the opposing views that need to be presented to children so they are not indoctrinated by education and to ensure that the law is complied with. Changes are needed to ensure that the provisions of the Education Act are complied with.

Back at paragraph 2 of this article, it was stated that we would return to the Duty of the Secretary of State in terms of the missing accoutability. This is that time.

It has been shown how s.406 and s.407 catch Headmasters, Boards of Govenors and Local Authorities but let us now reconsider the duty of the Secretary of State for Education.

The Rt Hon Gavin Williamson is the current Secretary of State. His main duty is found in s.10. As discussed earlier, Section 10 is a very general “promote the education of the people”. S.11 is basically the same. It appears that to be alerted to the issues against the current teachings of the Copernican model in the National Curriculum and to do nothing about changing it, this could easily breach the s.10 duty to promote “education” because the word “indoctrination” could be argued to be the antithesis. If Gavin Williamson MP was found to be actually allowing the promotion and indoctrination of education, this would surely cost the tax payer unnecessary legal costs. Failing to inform children of opposing views and allowing proper discussions to take place is a very simple alteration to the National Curriculum that would remove any risk under the provisions of s.406 and s.407.

Kenneth Baker introduced this National Curriculum and credit is given. His intentions at the time were clearly stated, to nationalise standards of education so children all received the same key points in life. However, this issue of the one sided Copernican indoctrination cannot surely be what was intended by Lord Baker back in 1988. A one sided presentation of Copernican views is only acceptable if there are no opposing views. However, there are opposing views and by virtue of that fact, the law dictates that the pupils are presented a balanced presentation for the opposing views. At the moment, this simply does not happen. The sun is 93,000,000 miles away and if you do not memorise that value, you will fail your exam if you do not recite it on demand.

In law, it is respectfully submitted that all four named parties (Secretary of State for Education, Local Authorities, Boards of Governers and Head Teachers) all over the country are breaching s.406 by failing to forbid the promotion of partisan political views because there are no opposing views or subsequent discussion, following the decision of the Judge in Dimmock.

Whether the sun is 93,000,000 miles away or not is not the issue. The issue is whether or not the way the Coperican model is taught within the National Curriculum could be deemed as promoting political indoctrination and, if so, has this issue been alerted to the right people and did those people make changes to allow for opposing views to be presented to children? If not, the law is being broken but the bigger issue is, there has been thirty years since the National Curriculum has been introduced and that is a whole generation that has missed out on the reality of our world perhaps not being Copernican after all.

This could be argued to have zero real value but also can also trigger people into the realisation that they have missed out on something that they should have been told years ago and had they actually been told, they would have had the ability to try and work out the nature of our world for themself with systematic experimentation, as per the definition of science (found above). Perhaps more interest on science would have resulted if the perception is that there might be more to our world and we could find out new and amazing discoveries. By teaching a one sided and dogmatic doctrine, thirty years of education may been compromised and people might not have been told the truth. Again, it may be the case that the sun really is 93,000,000 miles away but rather than being indoctrinated with that figure, the legally compliant way that the law demands education to behave is to allow the presentation of opposing views if some issues that are opposing the official narrative are presented to students. For the last thirty years this has not happened and it should not be the case that another 30 years passes.

For  the benefit of  science, education, the National Curriculum generally, for teachers teaching it, Headmasters responsible for ensuring that s.406/7 is complied with, Boards of Govenors everywhere and each Local Authorities up and down the country and of course the Secretary of State personally, this article should be considered to be raising the flag against the taught “fact" of the Copernican doctrine in school to now inform others that the Copernican model simply is not accepted as truth and, ipso facto, this then means that all parties must ensure that s.407 and the duty to offer a balanced presentation of opposing views is triggered and complied with.

The curriculum should encourage and allow for opportunities for learning away from educational contraints rather than promote a one sided position that does have legitimate oppsing views and evidences. The reason for s.407 is to allow that child to come to their own decision about what evidences they accept.

Is this better than just being indoctrinated by a one sided, biased, pseudo science passed off as real science, story based on a character (Copernicus) that cannot even be verified to even exist? Remember, his views were based on another character (Eratsthenes) that it is doubtful if he even existed either.

Ultimately, the question for a court to decide is whether or not the teachings of the Copernican model are actually indoctrination following the decision of Dimmock and for the reasons outlined above in this article, it is almost certain that the National Curriculum teaching of the Copernican model is one sided and promoted indoctrination and the only way this would be lawful is to allow the presentation of opposing views to the contrary and genuinely challenging the views of the Copernican model. This would trigger significant nationwide academic discussion and reignite interest in real science amongst scholars and practitioners of science.

End



    2019-09-22_17-27-07.png


   2019-09-22_17-27-28.png


   2019-09-22_17-28-22.png

- - 

Sleeping Warrior's Legal Failure Mirror + Intro, by Miles Davis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkX8lFD06Yc

I think Everett Anderson did a good job of addressing the legal argument in Sleeping Warrior's (aka Anthony Riley) dissertation. His channel doesn't attract very many views so I'm mirroring his video here where it might get a few hundred rather than just a few dozen views.

Miles Davis says, “Anthony’s dissertation makes a legal argument that the alternative ides to the earth being a sphere should be taught in schools.  His legal arguments is based on the Education Act of 1996 which prohibits the teaching of partisan politics.   And a ruling in a case called the dimmic case where the film made by Al Gore about climate change was challenged as whether was suitable to be shown to school children in Britain, on the basis that it was partisan political in nature.  And Anthony uses some of the judgement in that case to bolster his argument. 

Everett does a lovely job here showing how in fact the ruling in that case goes against Anthony’s argument rather than supporting it.”

- - 

Sleeping Warrior's Legal Failure, by Everett Anderson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT-ukAo5HEY 


"Anthony Riley wants to get Flat Earth into the public schools, so he attempted to construct a legal argument, which he apparently submitted to his law school, to do just that. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like it's going to happen any time soon...."


   2019-09-25_23-13-13.png


   2019-09-25_23-13-26.png


   2019-09-25_23-13-36.png


   2019-09-25_23-13-56.png


Anthony Riley = FAIL

- - 

Sleeping Warrior FAILS again..., by Everett Anderson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsBo9-RXe88

"Another lame argument from Anthony "Sleeping Warrior" Riley's legal thesis, which he created in an attempt to "sneak flat Earth" into the schools...'


   2019-09-25_23-23-26.png


- - 

Update: January 2020

Sleeping Warrior Still Can't Science, by BlueMarbleScience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WArmXPb8HwI

Sleeping Warrior manages to ignore clear evidence in his own referenced video showing the location of the horizon - just more of the same I suppose!

Sleeping Warrior Original Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BFwc...
Sleeping Warrior Rebuttal Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_tx8...
BMLSB Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9GBw...
BMLSB Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgA_7...


- - 

Update: February 2020

Density | Crushing the Soul of Flat Earth [part 1], by Bob the Science Guy and Dr. Russell Pinizzotto        
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0LI42vETHY


We begin our series on crushing the soul of flat earth by introducing Dr. Russell Pinizzotto who explains how Sleeping Warrior got his simple 'floating bowling balls' demonstration all sideways in a vain attempt to support the 'Relative Density' argument of Flat Earth...
NOTE:
Please turn on the English Subtitles (not the auto generated ones) due to poor audio quality from Dr. Pinizzotto. I went through the subtitles and edited them by hand, so have a look.
Original Sleeping Warrior Video:
https://youtu.be/bcDA5ARpr84

-

Gravity | Crushing the Soul of Flat Earth [part2], by by Bob the Science Guy and Dr. Russell Pinizzotto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J30BV53IXpc

In the second part of the interview with Dr. Russell Pinizzotto we examine gravity, Newton/Einstein, civil engineering and the Cavendish Experiment. 


- - 

Update: March 22, 2020

Debunk by BlueMarbleScience
Anthony Riley Just Doesn't Get It, by BlueMarbleScience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gdIgIVHQMY


"Sleeping Warrior thinks distances travelled depend on which direction you're going! Get some extra oven mitts! You're gonna need them!"

- - 

Update: October 26, 2020

Debunk by WheresWa11y
Mr Sensible's MAGE 2 Balloon Tore At 2 TORR And Shredded Flat Earth, by WheresWa11y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x46-XtrZCc

A ghostly balloon image is just the BEST at showing why Sleeping Warrior's idea that gas expands
INSTANTLY into a vacuum is kinda dumb.

MAGE II - What shape is the Earth?
Mr Sensible -
https://youtu.be/dVOLj1je0lk


- - 

Update: November 3, 2020

A Message to Anthony Riley AKA Sleeping Warrior, by Ranty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIzimMuBiiE


   
   Sleeping Warrior 3.jpg



     Sleeping Warrior 1.jpg



     Sleeping Warrior 2.jpg



     Sleeping Warrior 5.jpg



     Sleeping Warrior 6.jpg

-

     Sleeping Warrior 7.jpg


- - 

Update: January 20, 2021

Debunk by Hugh Jarsz
Riley and the "Blerfers"?, by Hugh Jarsz 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSLFSATg4oQ

According to Anthony, Flerf + ball earth = Blerfers


Sleeping Warrior (aka Anthony Riley) is wibbling on again about 'relative density' and other such nonsense. He's finally caught my attention. He won't enjoy it.

AB Science showing how the 'eggsperiment' should have been done:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SH8M...

What did he say?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBylQ...
Mr Sensible's Cheese Experiment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9SoP...
FTFE's Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrwp...

"Gas go down go boom boom" by Mr Pascal Marx:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uy66S...

Riley's original video: Blerfers think mass causes "weight."  They cannot explain this little problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4xcr...


- - 

Update: January 21, 2021

Debunk by BlueMarbleScience
Nathan and Anthony Scew Up Gravity, by BlueMarbleScience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbpCBMsJtAg

It's hard to believe how stupid these two morons are!


- - 

Update January 22, 2021

Debunk by BlueMarbleScience
Oakley, Riley, and QE Implode, by BlueMarbleScience 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GIoM7BEsl0

These three nitwits don't understand that objects on earth always accelerate toward the ground at the same rate - air resistance accounted for of course.


   Implode 1.jpg

-
   
   Implode 2.jpg  



   Implode 3.jpg

- - 

Update February 16, 2021

Debunk by FTFE
Flat Earther Doesn't Understand Planes....Or Anything!, by FTFE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBMf4eJAKfc

Oh god NO! What have I done? TOO MUCH STUPID! THe universe could IMPLODE!!!


- - 

Update February 23, 2021

Debunk by WheresWally
Sleeping Warrior RDD Gets Owned By Bubbles In A Space Water Ball, by WheresWally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0zjDZEqHPs

Well done Anthony, your video is running at about a grade 5 level.
Lets see if it can achieve any sort of scientific explanations.
0:46 NOT A VOICE CHANGER - MY BAD
Anthony used this source however.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omRMp...

-----COOL VIDEOS-------------- 野口宇宙飛行士の宇宙暮らし 014: 水で遊ぼう!
Soichi Noguchi -
https://youtu.be/urMNywqQfRM

Mr Sensible LIVE! (Last minute impromptu!)
Mr Sensible -
https://youtu.be/VE7Jocs-iaA

Using Riley's Independent Variable to prove GRAVITY is An Acceleration [REPOST]
https://youtu.be/TN8Kt4u6kjs

===========derp reference video================
How to calculate gravity at the "Really is" level.
Sleeping Warrior -
https://youtu.be/P5cZy0GF29k


- - 

Update August 1, 2021

Debunk by WheresWally
Sleeping Warrior's Bedtime Nursery Rhyme Is An Immediate Fail, by WheresWally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hLfAl_C7uM

Bromine and vacuum just showed Anthony's poor understanding of EVERYTHING

-----------derp links--------------
Why doesnt the bromine coexist next to the vacuum like you claim earth does?
Sleeping Warrior -
https://youtu.be/igtKvSbGjjY

- - 

Update September 14, 2021

Flat Earthers Target Children On Tic Tok - With Ranty & Brainy Beaver, by FTFE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYNYq9ak3cg

We go over the disgusting actions of Sleeping Warrior - DFOTY 2019
With Ranty -
Brainy Beaver -


- - 

Update: October 11, 2021

Debunk by FTFE (Fight the Flat Earth)
Flat Earther Become Child Predator!, by FTFE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsKXd0DEvLU

Yeah, this made me MAD. Anthony Riley, Otherwise known as Sleeping Warrior needs putting on a list.

Everyone who ever loved him was wrong.

- - - 

Update:  October 31, 2021

Debunk by Conspiracy Catz
Starting around 3:47 time mark
You wouldn't believe the things flat earthers say!, by Conspiracy Catz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3Xnin3FzRQ


- - - 
 
Update: November 2, 2021

Debunk by BlueMarbleScience
Rachie00000 and Anthony Riley Have Accused me of Cheating!, by BlueMarbleScience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgNrJxFnUEw

It seems that Rachie00000 and Anthony Riley think I rigged the Cavendish tests! Personally, I think Anthony is just mad because his Cavendish attempt is now a mop bucket and mine is sitting in a University physics lab!


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Update: November 3, 2021

Debunk by BlueMarbleScience
Adam Meakin, Oakley and Riley Three For the Price of One!, by BlueMarbleScience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7ZHgnJysFE

These guys think "r" on Newton's universal law of gravitation in the radius of the Earth!

Original Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFjjN...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Update: November 5, 2021

Debunk by M2M
Off Topic - Riley and people like Riley are responsible, by M2M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y12kW45jG9E

"We've had in the flat earth community twice now, Rob Skiba and now FE Focker, have died because they listened to people like Anthony Riley who put out comments content saying that Covid is not real.

So here's the thing.  I personally my opinion, I hold people like Riley personally responsible for people within your community dying of covid.  Yes, it's your f..ing fault.  You are f..ing responsible Riley and people like you Riley, are responsible for these deaths..."   


#SleepingWarrior
#FlerfSpective
#flatearthfocker

Ranty's video -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74UZ7...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Update: December 3, 2021

Debunk by Rob Parks
The Rob Shouts into the Void...Again with special guest Sleeping Warrior, by Rob Parks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CG7rq52BkpM&t=0s

The Rob is frustrated and needs to get somethings off his chest. Plus I want to plug my new show with intro by Steaming Cup of Reason (please check out his channel).

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Update: December 15, 2021

Debunk by Bob the Science Guy
Sleeping Gravity, by Bob the Science Guy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfc_mIxbNZI

Looking at the errors in scientific reasoning in science denial, we examine Sleeping Warrior and Gravity. This will be followed by a discussion following his presentation on Nathan Oakley's channel which will be dissected in a live stream later this week.

More "science denial" from Anthony

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Update: December 16, 2021

Debunk by Bob the Science Guy
Sleeping Gravity - The Sequel, by Bob the Science Guy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wvLgiOSu58

Following his stellar performance yesterday, we get the FED panel's response to Sleeping Warrior's Presentation debunking Newton''s Laws of Motion (well 2/3 isn't bad)


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Update: January 1, 2022

Debunk by BlueMarbleScience
Anthony Riley Can't Figure Out Cavendish to Save His Life!, by BlueMarbleScience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEroryiFOt4

When something threatens the beliefs of a fanatic like Riley, what do they do? Lie about it of course and Riley is really good at lying!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Update: January 5, 2022

Debunk by BlueMarbleScience
Riley Claims to be Targeting Children on the Internet, by BlueMarbleScience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLnknnc43jU

Either Riley is trolling us, or he's adopted tactics typically used by internet predators to harm children. The thought is very disturbing!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Update: January 8, 2022

Debunk by Bob the Science Guy
Sleepy Gravity - The Claim, by Bob the Science Guy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qST1LfUvIjg

The logical reasoning of science denial. 
In this episode Sleeping Warrior gives his thoughts on gravity and tries to explain the globe position....

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Update: January 9, 2022

Debunk by Bob the Science Guy
Sleepy Gravity The Sequelby Bob the Science Guy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAiS1a4A3_k

Listening to Sleeping Warrior try to explain Gravity.... The Panel Discussion.



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Other articles about Anthony Riley:

Sleeping Warrior (Anthony Riley) - flat Earther slings reprehensible sexual diatribe against Conspiracy Catz.  Do not read unless you are at least 21 years old

Flat Earth NOT - Density is not a force as claimed by flat Earthers Sleeping Warrior (Anthony Riley) and others - Cavendish?

Sleeping Warrior (Anthony Riley) - - caught deleting video comments that expose flat Earth as a delusion


- - - 





Published on – February 13, 2019

Discussion at - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7ipUKERU0tzYFxALJBli4A/discussion

Our home page all articles - http://flatearthlunacy.com

kind regards, JonahTheScientist

- - - - - - - - - - 

   2019-03-02_00-53-27.png


- - - - - - - - - - 


Print Email