+Flat Earth Scientist, so tell me intelligent one
1) If not human beings, who put this new object up into the heavens?
2) Assuming it is man made and rockets don't work in the vacuum of space, how did it get up there?
3) Do you agree or disagree that it's a man made satellite?
4) At its altitude of 700 Km, the heavenly Dome seems not be there. Or is the Dome higher than that?
5) What forces or laws of nature keep this object in the heavens, continuously moving day after day, and not falling down?
Flat Earth Scientist - he says they are fire creatures, not satellites
Dear Flat Earth Scientist,
Fact check = You FAIL
We have determined by your actions that you are not a scientist. It's not nice for you to lie to people.
Fact check = You FAIL
Based on your answers to the questions posed by Quail Jefferson below, it's apparent that you are delusional and in denial of what the world really is...
Fire creatures instead of satellites? Really. Where is your head?
Your new YouTube account is shut down
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXBeps8NpNjwebTypGykMTA/videos
Your old account still remains operational
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLCbmzWgO_qQ0grAXPrZHWw
Quail Jefferson
- - -
Update: September 7, 2021
The Geo Satellites are eclipsing again - Will Flat Earthers make observations or excuses?, by Wolfie6020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMTyYgKHL7c
This is the third Equinox where I have filmed the satellites eclipsing.
This is due to the proximity of the Sun to the Celestial Equator, casting the Earth's shadow across the line of Geostationary Satellites.
The satellites in this video are
Chinasat 16
Chinasat 10
JCSAT 15 BSAT 3C
BSAT 3A
BSAT 3B
BSAT 4A
BSAT 4B
A detailed explanation is in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1o9Z...
- - -
Update: December 16, 2021
Using land based observations of two geocentric satellites, from two different locations, the Radius of the Earth is correctly determined. The R proof with satellites.
Debunk by WheresWally
WheresWally Measures The Earths Radius - It was Super Easy, Barely An Inconvenience - 3 BTC PLZ, by WheresWally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1EOR-J9nGI
So now will DIRTH admit defeat and award WheresWally the three Bit Coins fpr proving r (radius of the Earth)?
Seems DITRH is out of ideas so by default he has validated the proof of R. All the other prerequisites have been meet too.
The Original video submitted to DITRH
WheresWally And Wolfie6020 Measure "R" Twice, I Can Has 3 DITRH Bitcoins Now Plz
WheresWally - https://youtu.be/X3L_IEi2y44
- - -
Update: February 5, 2022
Why do flat-eathers have such a hard time believing the International Space Station (ISS) is real when they can literally buy a telescope and see fo themselves?
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-flat-earthers-have-such-a-hard-time-believing-the-ISS-is-real-when-they-can-literally-buy-a-telescope-and-see-for-themselves
That's why there are thousands of flat-earth videos on YouTube where they:
- Claim video of activities aboard the ISS are faked in high altitude aircraft doing a parabolic maneuver
- Make fun of "astro-NOTS"
- Insult NASA as liars
- Claim all videos of the Earth from space are Hollywood style CGI fakes
- Assert that the ISSTracker ~ Real-Time Location Tracking of the International Space Station software is actually tracking a high altitude drone
Does this look like a drone?
Credit: The International Space Station photographed by Ralf Vandebergh.
From the Wikipedia page about him: Ralf Vandebergh - Wikipedia
"The image shows not only the ISS with very special lighting angle but also it shows activity around the ISS which is often the case. You see the Japanese Cargo Ship HTV-1 in its demonstration flight shortly before docking and just a few hundred meters below the ISS."
Ralf Vandebergh (born 1976) is a Dutch astronomer, professional photographer and veteran satellite spotter from Nijswiller (nl). He is known for photographing the Sun, Moon, planets, satellites, NASA Space Shuttles, and the International Space Station from Earth using a telescope-mounted camera. His work is widely published in the media.
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -