Mon Qoose (Lee Underwood??) - flat Earth advocate FAIL
Dear Mon Qoose (Lee Underwood??),
Mon Qoose - a delusional flat Earth advocate claims to have Super Natural powers...
We are happy to debate the shape of the Earth, but your statement like "I easily transcend to all dimensions at will and rarely re-enter the 3rd unless I am guiding a promising subject to ascend" lead us to think we are not dealing with a rational human being.
As such, good bye and good luck.
It's unfortunate that your lack of science understanding and susceptibility to conspiracy theories has led you down this wrong path. The Earth is a beautiful blue globe spinning on axis once per day, and in revolution around the Sun.
- - -
Dear Readers,
Listed below for your review is the email exchange we had with Mon Qoose. Please notice his out-of-this-world religious rantings...
Roof Masters said,
Jonah,
I saw your response to Brian Austin Lambert where you mocked Flat Earth.
Surely you must concede the “official narrative” about the Globe Earth Model is laughable and full of “facts” easily disproven by simple scientific testing.
So rather than mocking Flat Earth please PROVE the Globe Earth Model.
- Explain how pilots compensate for curvature of the Earth
- Explain how the Earth is traveling at incredible speeds as it hurtles through Time & Space and how “The Theory of Gravity” can be scientifically proven under that “model”
- Explain how we are in a helio-centric Model and “the stars” are outside of our solar system and also traveling at phenomenal speeds; and yet they still continue to appear in the same places in our sky seasonally like clockwork (even though they are not dependent on EARTH as a pivot point).
I could go On-and-On but why don’t you just call your buddies Alex Jones and Mike Rothschild and Oprah and get back to us with those answers there Braniac...
#TickTock
#TheDaysAreGettingShorter
MonQoose33
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JonahTheScientist said,
Ok Mr. "easily disproven by simple scientific testing" Let's try an easy one, your number 3.
Fact check = TRUE = "yet they still continue to appear in the same places in our sky"
The reason = it's because the distances involves are so huge, even after 100 years they appear to have hardly moved at all with respect to the other surrounding stars in the sky. (ps. you need a telescope to see that tiny motion)
So if it's easily proven, then you give me your answer to the following. Email your result back to me.
1. Proper Motion is the apparent angular motion of a star across the sky with respect to distant stars. That's what you are talking about in question 3.
For example, the Sun moves about 15-degrees across the sky in one hour. OK?
2. Barnard's Star is the SECOND CLOSEST star to the Sun. It is only 5.95 light years away.
That is = 34,977,821,970,428 miles = 56,291,347,921,176 kilometers
3. With respect to the Earth, Barnard's star is traveling at a speed of 90 km/s tangentially to us.
Question for you:
So at that speed and distance (90 km/sec and 56,291,347,921,176 kilometers away) how many degrees in the sky per year would Bernard’s star actually appear to move when compared to its surrounding stars?
Answer:
A = 1 degree per year?
B = 10.3 arc/seconds per year?
C = 1/60th degree per year?
What is your answer? A, B or C? And show the math how you came up with your answer.
(Maybe we should have chosen a star 25,000 light years away, which is where the center of our galaxy is).
kind regards,
JonahTheScientist
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Roof Masters said,
Jonah,
I barely read your reply; and that is unfortunate since you appear to have put way too much thought into it.
Your “science” is a blatant lie; and I reside at a realm of consciousness several planes higher than your feeble brains present habitation.
I easily transcend to all dimensions at will and rarely re-enter the 3rd unless I am guiding a promising subject to ascend.
My questions to you were actually “trick questions” as they led you to default to your brainwashed “science.”
The “stars” and “constellations” are NOT what you believe; and your reply confirms you aren’t “one of the controllers” but rather just a Useful Idiot believing and writing what you have been “taught” at a silly little camp of Indoctrination.
“Barnard’s Star” doesn’t meet any of the actual qualifications of a “star” and your ignorant belief it is 5.95 light years away is beyond laughable.
And your “math” is beneath me. I learned this when I was in elementary and junior high. I solved the most complex “mathematics” simply in my mind. My “teachers” would always say I was wrong until I taught them the secrets of inter dimensional mathematics.
Your entire belief system is based on fraudulent, erroneous and pathetic “proofs”
I purposely made my questions overly simplistic and based on your erroneous understanding of physics to expose how simple minded and intellectually immature you are.
I also predicted you wouldn’t actually “answer” my questions using math; but would instead throw some mathematic Mumbo Jumbo back instead.
However I’m not cruel so I recommend you start by forgetting everything you “learned” at school, perfecting your comprehension of Vortex Math and seek humility.
If you start tonight you may have a chance to survive The End, which will occur in 14 years.
Follow up the humility with meditation and seeking answers from higher beings to accelerate your learning.
Good Luck Jonah,
MonQoose
P.S. Don’t EVER listen to Neil Degrasse Tyson or any of those other frauds.
- - -
Roof Masters
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Published on – January 19, 2019
Discussion at - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7ipUKERU0tzYFxALJBli4A/discussion
Our home page all articles - http://flatearthlunacy.com
kind regards, JonahTheScientist