Main Menu



Dear Visitors,

Thank you for stopping at  

My journey to debunk flat Earth YouTube channels started 6 years ago.  
As a scientist with college degree in Astronomy, Physics and Mathematics, I was appalled to find folks telling outright lies and presenting bad science to bolster suspicion of our known accepted reality - that the Earth is a beautiful blue globe.

For the first 3 years I left video comments showing solid scientific evidence that flat Earth is fiction.  It's based on personal religious belief and purposeful conspiracy.   There are different personal agendas at play.   During those 3 years’ channels owners deleted my proofs and eventually banned me.  They worked to keep their video comment sections "clean" of any discussion contradictory to what they wanted to present.

Then for the next 2 years I posted my video comment debug proofs on Google plus.  I wanted a forum where I could post - without being deleted by the channels I was debunking.  That worked fine for a while, but eventually I noticed that about half of my articles, even though marked as "public," were not visible because of Google plus' auto spam/editing.

So in April of this year (2017) I decided to start this new blog ( so that none of my work could be deleted anymore.
This blog clearly shows scientific proofs that debunk everything that flat Earth proponents claim.
Here we also expose the comments those YouTube video channels delete, because they don't want you to see them. 

Thanks for visiting.

For the month of January 2018 our readership was up at 4,428 visitors, reading 6,246 pages - the best month yet!

The Earth is not flat.  That claim is a conspiracy theory perpetrated by ignorant people who have ulterior personal motives and agendas. 

The Earth is a beautiful blue spheroid globe spinning on an axis 23.5° once each day, and orbiting the Sun every 365.25 days.

We would appreciate your assistance in finding the true identity (real name and picture) of flat Earth posters, not already identified below.  If you have such information please email to us.  Thank you.    



kind regards,

Jonah The Scientist

(jThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)                 © 2018 - All rights reserved

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 


FLAT EARTH REFLECTIONS (Robert Bassano) - ASTROPHSYICS @ 45,000 Feet: SOFIA Wavelength Capability - Your 10 assertions


You made these following assertions (1 - 10) in the commentary section of the PLANATE VERITAS YouTube web site.

But since you did not like my answers, which clearly refuted and disproved everyone of your claims as being wrong, you deleted the whole stream of conversation and banned me from further posting on your site.

Is that how you deal with differing points of view?

Hi Robert,

Thank you for the invitation to debate whether the Hubble Space Telescope is real and currently in orbit around the Earth.

Over the next several days I will be responding to your stated positions (1-10), as listed below.

I would appreciate you answering my questions directly, without deflecting to some other topic. Otherwise it will be difficult to conduct a real debate.

Your stated stance is on the exist on HST is the following:

1) It never left the launch pad on April 24, 1990 [mission was delayed a few times].

2) If it did [which I don't believe it did based on my research] then they found out it didn't work and had to recapture it in another mission

3) HST was brought back down and gutted to be re-engineered to create Chandra and remaining parts made up SOFIA

4) They spent another $1.5bn to develop SOFIA program

5) Chandra is out there looking at another spacecraft. Not out in space. Which means I was lied to by HST Manager and Chandra can view HST. Chandra is pointed back at the earth.

6) All of HST images are CGI images - HST has 3 onboard cameras which can take video and HD images in color. That is NASA's claims.

7) Decaying orbit calculations should have HST within visible range of ISS with a 200-500mm telephoto lens. The ISS and HST actually come with range of one another during their supposes orbits.

8) HST has no way of maneuvering to keep itself in orbit. No propulsion system. They admit it!!

9) Listen to the interview with HST yourself -

10) And listen to what this NASA astronaut says -

kind regards, Jonah the scientist

Looking forward to your responses!!

This post is in response to the 10 claims made by Robert Bassano about the Hubble Space Telescope, the SOFIA (Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy) and the Chandra Space Telescope.

PLANATE VERITAS video channel title is...

PHONE CALL WITH SOFIA TEAM MANAGER! Is this Hubble & Chandra Space Telescopes @ 45,000 FEET?
Video at..

Published on – October 21, 2018

Discussion at -

Video at -

Our home page all articles -

kind regards, JonahTheScientist  

- - - - - - - - - -  


- - - 


- - - - - - - - - -