Joseph111 - - misguided vulgar rants & denial of direct evidence
Dear Joseph111,
So for you it's not about correct science, logic, reason or how the universe really functions. It's all about your blind eye religious beliefs.
You are in denial of scientific evidence. It's very interesting that of all living creatures on the Earth, human beings are the only ones to deny their living reality.
You suffer from self-denial, which is the refusal to accept reality or fact, acting as if a painful event, thought or feeling did not exist. It is considered one of the most primitive of the defense mechanisms because it is characteristic of early childhood development.
Denial, and also abnegation is used for a psychological defense mechanism, when a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.
This Denial is akin to Stephen Colbert’s “Truthiness,” in that these deniers adamantly refuse to accept verified scientific facts because they get in the way of their own rigid ideas.
Fact check = You FAIL
Your comments listed in the pictures below are vulgar and nonsense...
Curved water found - cars surfacing from under water at Lake Pontchartrian while they drive the causeway See car lights at night popping up from underwater on Lake Pontchartrain...
{...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhft0h9GLF0
{...http://flatearthlunacy.com/index.php/2-uncategorised/284-curved-water-found-by-youtube-channel-soundly
That comment clearly shows our globe Earth curvature, as cars on Lake Pontchartrian (Louisiana USA) seem to emerge from below the water and continue traveling on the causeway. That effect is due to cars on the causeway being under the observable horizon, then getting close enough to be seen (now above the horizon) as car lights suddenly appearing in the middle of the lake as if out of nowhere.
See below screen shots of Joseph's vulgar and profane rants.
Evidence also suggests that Joseph is a pathological liar, since he made grand claims about having an educational background, but cannot demonstrate the skills associated with it.
Joseph111 claims,
"I've got a BS in aerospace, an MAS from Embry Riddle in Space Studies, am finishing up my MBA this year and am a retired USAF navigator, with over 27 years in military experience. I can run rings all day around anyone in the field of celestial mechanics, aeronautical concepts, orbital mechanics, you name it……"
YET, HE WAS GIVEN THIS SIMPLE CELESTIAL MECHANICS HOMEWORK PROBLEM and has yet to provide an answer:
Joseph111, so let's take you up on your statement, "I can run rings all day around anyone in the field of celestial mechanics, aeronautical concepts, orbital mechanics, you name it."
When I took celestial mechanic in college we learned how to compute the orbit of any celestial body, from just three sky observations of its position.
So here are three observations. So that we don't call you a liar, give us the orbital parametric of this space object...
All positions (RA & Dec) are from the Greenwich Royal Observatory in England.
All times listed are Universal Time.
*
Observation 1:
Time: 05-Jan-2017 18:55 Europe/London
RA, right ascension = 03h 07m 41.8s
DEC, declination = 51° 10' 29.4" (J2000)
*
Observation 2:
Time: 03-May-2017 19:55 Europe/London
RA, right ascension = 03h 27m 14.6s
DEC, declination = 43° 12' 04.5" (J2000)
*
Observation 3:
Time: 02-Jun-2017 19:55 Europe/London
RA, right ascension = 03h 44m 12.0s
DEC, declination = 43° 46' 03.6" (J2000)
*
So now after you have solved this simple celestial mechanics homework assignment, list here for us the following values that you came up for the orbital parameters:
e, q, i, Ω, ω, T0
"The eccentricity, e, and either the semi-major axis, a, or the distance of periapsis, q, are used to specify the shape and size of an orbit. The angle of the ascending node, Ω, the inclination, i, and the argument of periapsis, ω, or the longitude of periapsis, ϖ, specify the orientation of the orbit in its plane. Either the longitude at epoch, L0, the mean anomaly at epoch, M0, or the time of perihelion passage, T0, are used to specify a known point in the orbit."
And as an added bonus, which comes from your same calculations, give us the:
Orbital period
Perihelion date
Perihelion distance
Semi-Major axis
Orbital eccentricity
Orbital inclination
ALL OF THOSE VALUES come out of the celestial mechanics calculations of an orbit.
So now please show us your results, or forever be branded as a liar.
*
No answer provided as of June 27, 2017
Discussion at - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7ipUKERU0tzYFxALJBli4A/discussion
Video at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLYuAuRUDSs&t=666s
kind regards, JonahTheScientist
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
More vugar comments by Joseph111
- - - - - - - - - - -
So here is the statement where Joseph111 claims to have all kinds of astronomical and celestial mechanic skills...
- - - - - - - - - - -
This challenge was posted to Joseph111 on June 25, 2017...
- - - - - - - - - -
More foul language from Joseph111...
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -